கிருத்துவ அனாதை இல்லங்ளின் இரட்டை வேடம் – இளம் சிறுமிகள் கற்பழிப்பு, விபச்சாரம், ஆபாச படங்கள் தயாரிப்பு முதலியன!

கிருத்துவ அனாதை இல்லங்ளின் இரட்டை வேடம் – இளம் சிறுமிகள் கற்பழிப்பு, விபச்சாரம், ஆபாச படங்கள் தயாரிப்பு முதலியன!

கிருத்துவ நிறுவனங்களின் இரட்டை வேடம்: அனைத்துலக கிருத்துவ நிறுவனங்கள், இந்த்யாவில் குழந்தைகள் பள்ளிகளுக்கு அனுப்பாமல், வேலைக்கு அனுப்புகின்றனர் என்றெல்லாம் புகைப்படங்கள், குறும்படங்கள், முதலியவற்றை எடுத்து, பிரபலப்படுத்தி, இந்தியப் பெற்றோர்கள் கொடியவர்கள் போலச் சித்தரித்துக் காட்டுகின்றனர். மாறாக, இந்தியர்களின் ஏழ்மையைப் பயன்படுத்திக் கொண்டு, குழந்தைகளைக் காப்போம், சிறுவர்-சிறுமிகளைக் காப்போம், என்றெல்லாம் தம்பட்டம் அடித்துக் கொண்டு, அவர்களது வாழ்க்கையினையே இப்படி சீரழித்து விடுகின்றனர். இப்பொழுது, மாட்டிக் கொண்ட இருவர் மற்றும் சென்னையில் மாட்டிக் கொண்டவர்கள் எல்லோருமே, இப்படி அனாட்தை இல்லங்கள் நடத்தும் கிருத்துவ நிறுவனங்கள் தாம்!

குழந்தைகள் காப்பகம் பெயரில் பிபச்சார இல்லங்கள்: டன்கேன் கிராண்ட் 1955ல் கொலபா என்ற இடத்தில் ஒரு காப்பகம், இல்லத்தை ஆரம்பித்தான்[1]. அதாவது 22 வயதிலேயே அங்கு வந்து இந்த தொழிலைச் செய்ய வேண்டும் என்று உறுதியாகவந்துள்ளது தெரிகிறது. ஆலன் வாட்டர்ஸ் என்பவனும், இங்கிலாந்திலிருந்து வரும் பணத்தை வைத்துக் கொண்டு அத்தகைய இல்லத்தை ஆரம்பித்து, தொழிலைத் தொடங்கினான். சிறுவர்-சிறுமிகளுக்கு இடம் கொடுத்தல், இரவில் தூங்க  இடம் கொடுத்தல், என்று ஆரம்பித்து, மெதுவாக, அவகளது நலன்களை பதுபாப்பது போன்ற உணர்வை ஏற்படுத்தினர். பிறகு தமது திட்டத்திர்கேற்றபடி சுற்றுலா விபச்சாரத்திற்கு, அந்த அப்பொழுது தான் வயதிற்கு வந்துள்ள 12-18 வயது சிறுவர்-சிறுமிகளை அந்நியர்களுக்கு விபச்சாரத்திற்கு அனுப்பி வைத்தனர்.

செக்ஸ் டூரிஸம் / சுற்றுலா விபச்சாரம் வளர்த்த விதம்: தெருவில் சுற்றும், வேலை செய்யும் சிறுவர்களுக்கு அங்கு இடம் கொடுக் பட்டது. 25-30 என்று குழுக்களாக அவர்கள் பிரிக்கப் பட்டு மூரத் மற்றும் பத்வர் பார்க் ஏரியாக்களில் உள்ள அந்நியதேச சுற்றுலா பயனிகளுக்கு அனுப்பி வைப்பர். அவர்கள் அந்த  அந்நியர்களுக்கு எல்லாவிதமான வேலைகளையும் செய்து வந்தனர். ஒன்று வெள்ளைத்தோல் அந்நியர், இரண்டு அவர்கள் நிறைய பணம் பரிசுப் பொருட்கள் முதலியவற்றை கொடுக்கிறார்கள் என்ற காரணங்களினால், செக்ஸ் மற்றும் புணர்ச்சிகளில் ஈடுபட்டாலும் முதலில் மறுத்தாலும் அல்லது ஏற்புடையதாக இல்லாமல் கர்தினாலும், பிறகு அவர்கள் பண ஆசை முதலியவற்ரை காட்டி உடன்பட செய்தார்கள். சுருக்கமாகச் சொல்வதானால் அவர்கள் செக்ஸ் டூரிஸம் / சுற்றுலா விபச்சாரம் செய்து வந்தனர்.

மும்பை, கோவா முதலிய இடங்களில் சகஜமாக நடகும் விபச்சாரம்:  இந்தியாவில், குறிப்பாக மும்பையில் இது மிகவும் சகஜமான நிகழ்ச்சியாக உள்ளது. வில்ஹெலம் மற்றும் லிலி மார்த்தி என்ற தம்பதியர் டிசம்பர் 12, 2002ல் மும்பையில், ஒரு ஹோட்டலில், சிறுமிகளுடன் தகாத முறையில் செக்ஸ் வைத்துஇக் கொண்டதற்கசக கையும் களவுமாக பிடிப்பட்டனர். நீதி மன்றம் அவகளுக்கு ஏழாண்டு கடுங்காவல் மற்ரும் ரூ. 15,000/- அபராதம் விதித்தது. ஆனால், மார்ச் 15, 2004ல் ஆளுக்கு ரூ. ஆறு லட்சம், ஒரு லட்சம் என அபராதம் கட்டி விட்டு, அப்பணத்தை பாதிக்கப் பட்டவர்களுக்கு கொடுத்து விட்டி, தப்பித்து விட்டனர்[2].

டன்கேன் கிராண்ட் (67) மற்றும் ஆலன் வாடர்ஸ் (63) [Duncan Grant and Allan Waters ] இருவருமே மிகப் பெரிய சிறுவர் செக்ஸ் கொடூரர்கள். மும்பை 2008ல் அவர்களை எப்படியோ விடுவித்து விட்டது. ஆனால், உச்சநீதி கோர்ட்டில். நன்றாக மாட்டிக் கொண்டு விட்டனர். இதனால், அவர்கள் எந்நேரத்திலும் கைது செய்யப்படலாம்[3]. அவர்களுடைய இந்திய கூட்டாளி வில்லியம் டிசௌஸா[William D’souza]வும் இதில் சம்ம்பந்தப்பட்டுள்ளான்.  இவர்களும் எல்லோரும் சிறுவர் காப்பகத்தில் இருக்கும் சிறுவர்-சிறுமியர்களை செக்ஸ் வன்புணர்ச்சி முதலிய காரியங்களை செய்து வந்தனர்[4]. மானேஜராக இருந்த வில்லியம் டிசௌஸா (49) அந்த இருவர்களுக்கும் வேண்டிய சிறுவர்-சிறுமியர்களை அனுப்பி வைத்தான்[5]. இதனால் 2006ல் கைது செய்யப் பட்டனர்.

2008ல் மும்பை நீதி மன்றம் போதிய ஆதாரங்கள் இல்லை என்று விடுவித்து விட்டது. இருப்பினும், அவர்கள் இந்தியவை விட்டு செல்லக் கூடாது என்று உச்சநீதி மன்றம் ஆணையிட்டது[6]. மேலும் ஆறு வருட கால சிறை தண்டனை அவர்க்க்க்களுக்கு அளித்தது மிகவும் அதிகம் என்று கூறியது. ஆனால், கண்ணால் பார்த்த சாட்சிகள் அவர்கள் சிறுவர்-சிறுமியர்களுடன் செக்ஸ் வைத்துக் கொண்டிடுந்ததைப் பார்த்ததாக உள்ளது. ஆகவே, இதை சாதாரண பிரச்சினையாக விட்டுவிடமுடியாது என்ரு உச்சநீதி மன்றம் கூறியுள்ளது. அதாவது, ஐந்தாண்டுகளுக்குப் பிறகு அவர்கள் மறுடியும் கைத் செய்யப் படப்போகிறர்ர்கள்!

சைட் லைஒன் இந்தியா ஃபவுண்டேஷன் (Childline India Foundation) என்ற சிறுவர்-சிறுமியர்களின் உரிமைகளுக்குப் போராடும் நிறுவனம் தான், உச்சநீதி மன்றத்தில் வழக்கு தொடர்ந்தது. இன்று வெற்றிப் பெற்றது.

வேதபிரகாஷ்

21-03-2011


குறிச்சொற்கள்: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

18 பதில்கள் to “கிருத்துவ அனாதை இல்லங்ளின் இரட்டை வேடம் – இளம் சிறுமிகள் கற்பழிப்பு, விபச்சாரம், ஆபாச படங்கள் தயாரிப்பு முதலியன!”

  1. vedaprakash Says:

    History of the Case:
    http://www.childlineindia.org.in/anchorage-case-history.htm

    In early 2001, on its phone helpline 1098, CIF had been receiving reports of abuse at the Anchorage Shelters. Similar reports had also reached the High Court appointed Maharashtra State Monitoring Committee on Juvenile Justice. The Committee in August 2001 visited the Anchorage Shelters and submitted a report to the High Court confirming the strong suspicion of sexual abuse and recommending a police investigation. The sexual abuse of the boys at Anchorage Shelters was also brought to the notice of Advocate Ms. Maharukh Adenwalla who works on issues of child rights, and she brought the same to the attention of the Bombay High Court in a matter in which she was amicus curae. The Bombay High Court passed directions to protect the boys at Anchorage Shelters. Thereafter, CIF lodged a detailed complaint at Cuffe Parade Police Station on 24-10-2001, but the police refused to investigate the said complaint as the matter was sub-judice. At the instance of Advocate Ms. Maharukh Adenwalla, the Bombay High Court directed the police to investigate the complaint filed by CIF. Police investigation revealed that two British nationals, Duncan Grant (Accused No. 1) and Alan Waters (Accused No. 2), used to run the Anchorage Shelters, which housed a large number of street children aged between 8-18 years. Willyam D’Souza (Accused No. 3), an Indian, and a former pimp for homosexual tourists, was the Manager of the shelters. The investigation revealed that Grant and Waters were sexually abusing the children under their care and that a large number of foreign paedophiles were regularly visiting the Shelters and taking the children to Goa where the children were also being sexually abused. The acts of abuse documented by the police investigation are: (a) oral sex forcibly performed on the boys, (b), forced manipulation of the boys’ penis, (c) boys made to forcibly manipulate the accused’s penis, (d) sadistic beatings of the boys, (e) biting of the boys for perverse pleasure, etc.

    The trial was delayed on account of the fact that Grant and Waters had absconded from India after the facts became public. The Government, through Interpol, issued international red corner alerts for the arrest of Grant and Waters. Waters was arrested on his arrival at New York airport, and after a lengthy extradition process and after he exhausted all appellate avenues, he was extradited to India to stand trial. Duncan Grant was found to be hiding in Tanzania where he had started similar shelters for children. He was deported to Britain and forced to return to India to stand trial.

    The Sessions Court Case :

    During the trial, three of the five victim boys were bought over by the Accused by offers of large amounts of cash and even a house. However, two of the victim boys showed exemplary courage and integrity by stepping into the witness box, deposing about what they had endured, and facing a grueling cross examination by a top defence lawyer. Their evidence, which emerged unscathed through this ordeal, mirrors their helplessness and innocence. They have spoken in clear terms about the prolonged abuse they suffered at the hands of the Accused, the nature of the sexual acts perpetrated on them, and their desperation and poverty which prevented them from leaving the shelter or filing a complaint. Their evidence was corroborated by other sources, including the evidence Ms. Adenwalla and one of the members of the High-Court appointed Committee on Juvenile Justice, both of whom had personally and independently spoken with the victim boys and verified their claims of sexual abuse. The Defence came out with the case that at the instance of some people who wanted to take over the Anchorage Shelters Advocate Maharukh Adenwalla and CIF had bribed and tutored the victim boys to falsely implicate Grant and Waters. The trial judge found the Defense case to be untenable and far-fetched; Consequently, the Sessions Court held that it had been proved beyond any doubt that the Accused persons had sexually exploited a large number of street children. Fully aware of how difficult and rare such prosecutions are even though such offences are on the increase, the judgment of the Sessions Court, while convicting them under sections 120 B, 107, 373 and 377 IPC sentenced Grant and Waters to six years imprisonment and a fine of £20,000/- each, stated that a deterrent punishment, was being imposed in order to help wipe ‘out the name of India from the map of sex tourism. . let paedophiles all over the world know that India should not be their destination in future.’ The said judgement was hailed as a landmark judgement in its field by lawyers, academics and the public.

    The Bombay High Court Case :

    Allan Waters and Duncan Grant filed an Appeal in the Bombay High Court ( Cr Appeal no 476) against the state with Mahrukh Adenwalla as respondent. William D’Souza filed an appeal (no 681) against the state and the State also filed an appeal (603) against all three for enhancement of sentence. The case was argued in the courts of Hon’ble Judges Bilal Nazki and Sharad Bobde JJ.

    Mr. Taraq Sayed with Mr. S.V. Kotwal and Mr. S.S. Bhandari for the Appellants in Criminal Appeal No. 476 of 2006

    Mr. Vijay Nahar, Special Public Prosecutor, for the State with Ms. Maharukh Adenwalla and Mr. Y. Chaudhary for the Respondents 3 in Criminal Appeal No. 476 of 2006

    Mr. D.S. Mhaispurkar, Additional Public Prosecutor, for the State in Criminal Appeals No. 476 and 603 of 2006.

    In their judgement delivered on 23 rd July, the hon’ble judges have stated:

    • The testimony of the two boys, Sunil and Kranti , which was the basis for the Trial Court’s judgement cannot be considered reliable as their testimonies recorded by the Police subsequent to the FIR was not consistent with what they recorded with Meher Pestonjee, freelance journalist and Maharukh Adenwala prior to the FIR being lodged- the judges agreed with the Defence that this construed as improving the testimony and not corroborative as contended by the Prosecution.

    • The testimony of Mahrukh Adenwala was construed as “hearsay” and hence not relevant.

    • The acts that the boys testimony reported were ruled to not indicate a definitive crime under Section 377.

    • The States appeal for enhancement was dismissed as the testimony of the victims was not reliable.

    • The accused were acquitted of all charges.

    The reasons given by the Hon’ble Court for acquitting the Accused are extremely flimsy; they are not sustainable and do not withstand scrutiny. The Ld. judges have ignored the settled position of law as to how evidence of child victims of sexual violence is to be appreciated. Instead, they applied a completely unrealistic yardstick in evaluating that evidence. The Judges have not considered that the victims were illiterate street children and cannot be put to the same test as an educated adult. Moreover, the Judges have also failed to recognize that to enable street children to freely and fearlessly speak about the abuse perpetrated upon them to the police and before the court, great courage and support is necessary.

    The Ld. judges have also held that since no complaint was made for a long time, that the FIR was delayed and that the child witnesses did not run away from the shelter though they were free to do so, suggests that that no sexual abuse took place. The Ld. judges have completely ignored the fact that the victims of sexual abuse were vulnerable and defenceless street children who were so desperate to get a roof over their heads that they were prepared to put up with the sexual abuse. The Ld. judges have also rejected the evidence of the child witnesses on the basis of some minor omissions which are not material and which do not touch the core issue of sexual abuse. Here again, the Ld. Judges have ignored the settled position in law regarding how omissions have to be evaluated and appreciated. If this judgement becomes a precedent for appreciating evidence of victims of child sexual abuse, a large number of perverts and paedophiles will walk free, and it will be almost impossible to obtain convictions against them. Further, if this judgement is not overruled and publicly condemned, the public confidence in the administration of justice will be undermined.

    The High Court even refused to stay its judgement for a few days to enable an appeal to the Supreme Court which would prevent the release of the Accused from jail. It should be noted that two out of the three accused persons are British nationals, and that all three accused persons have at different stages done their utmost to abscond and evade the process of law in India . If the Accused are released before the appeal can be filed and heard in the Supreme Court, it will be impossible to bring them back to India for the hearing. In the famous Martis case, even though the passports of the convicted Swiss couple was in the custody of the police, they were able to flee the country after being released from jail.

    Child sexual abuse in institutions is widespread, and yet prosecutions are notoriously rare and convictions are rarer still. The victims are under the control of the paedophiles; they are vulnerable and embarrassed by what has happened to them; they are scared that if they complain they will lose their shelter and food which they need to survive in the cities; they lack support, and ultimately do not depose in court, either because they are too scared to do so, or because they have been bribed / pressurized by the Accused. Most victims are illiterate, which only compounds the problems of gathering evidence and putting up a strong case. Most of these problems are systemic and endemic to this situation. However, in the few cases where these problems have been overcome, the Courts have let the people down by disbelieving the victims on minor technical grounds. Unless this changes, the most vulnerable category of our people will continue to be exploited and paedophiles will never be brought to justice.

    It is expected that upon paperwork being completed by Monday 28 th July, 2006, the accused would be set free.

    Current Concerns

    The present case is an exceptional case deserving special attention for three reasons : (1) the trial court has delivered a very strong, reasoned and emphatic judgment of conviction; (2) the offences involved are very serious and heinous in the context of an internationally proliferating and organised business of child sex tourism and paedophilia; (3) since a British national has been extradited from New York pursuant to a red corner alert issued by our government, the success of our future extradition requests would not be taken seriously by any government if the prosecution case were to be dismissed so easily.

    The appeal has raised several important questions of law of general public importance, which need authoritative pronouncement by the Supreme Court

    The public prosecutor will recommend that the State of Maharashtra files an appeal, but it will take a long time for the necessary resolutions to be passed, the appeal to be drafted and filed. In the meanwhile, Grant and Waters will have been released from jail, and they will certainly leave the country immediately, especially because they know that the High Court verdict will be challenged in the Supreme Court. The State has already expended large sums of money to have the accused brought to India for trial. If these persons are able to leave the country after their release from jail, it will be very difficult and expensive to bring them back to finish their sentence, should the State Appeal be allowed by the Supreme Court. Therefore, it is imperative that the Supreme Court be moved in urgency as soon as the judgement of acquittal is delivered in order to stay the judgement of the High Court.

    The Petitioners before the Supreme Court will be Advocate Maharukh Adenwalla (who was a named Respondent in the appeals before the Bombay High Court) and CHILDLINE India Foundation (who was the original complainant in this case). The public prosecutor is Vijay Nahar, who offered his services in the case almost probono.

  2. vedaprakash Says:

    18-03-2011 அன்றைய உச்சநீதி மன்ற தீர்ப்பை இங்குள்ளது: http://www.childlineindia.org.in/pdf/SC-judgement-anchorage-case.pdf இதைப் படிக்கவே நா கூசுகிறது. ஏனெனில் அத்தகைய ஆபாசமான காரியங்களை செய்துள்ளார்கள். இவர்கள் தாம் நாகரிகமானவர்கள் என்றெல்லாம் தம்பட்டம் அடித்துக் காட்டுவது, கேவலத்திலும் கேவமான விஷயமே.

  3. vedaprakash Says:

    Long way to go

    The extradition of Alan Waters, charged in a case of child abuse, is a beginning but much more needs to be done, writes MEENA MENON.

    PTI Sunday, Mar 27, 2005;
    http://www.hinduonnet.com/thehindu/mag/2005/03/27/stories/2005032700310400.htm
    Welcome step: Waters being produced in court after extradition.
    IT is a little over three years since a group of teenaged minor boys mustered up the courage to file complaints against two British nationals, accusing them of sexual abuse and physical torture. One of them, Alan Waters, was extradited from the United States of America on September 6, 2004, by a team from the Colaba police station in South Mumbai, whereas Duncan Grant, the other accused, was last traced to Tanzania where he was detained last year, but later disappeared.

    The Mumbai police are still trying to trace Grant, against whom there is a red corner notice. Grant founded and ran the Anchorage Shelter, a trust, for boys living in and around the Gateway of India, with donations from the United Kingdom.

    First case

    This is probably the first case where a person wanted for sexual offences has been brought back to face trial in India. The case is about to come up for trial at the sessions court. William, the former manager of the shelter, and Waters face charges of physical and sexual abuse. Anchorage Shelter Trust was established in 1995 in Colaba South Mumbai and the project manages three shelter homes, one located outside the city at Murud. The shelter was not closed down after the case was filed, and is still being run by the trustees.

    Apart from this case, the experience of child rights activists with cases of paedophilia is unhappy to say the least. Social workers from the Forum Against Child Sexual Exploitation (FACSE) had to work hard to ensure that an elderly Swiss couple, Wilhelm and Lili Marti, were trapped on December 12, 2002, with young girls in a hotel in suburban Mumbai. The trial court sentenced them to seven years rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 15,000 each. However, on March 15, 2004, the High Court set aside their conviction and allowed the Martis to “settle” the matter as suggested by them, by paying a fine of Rs. 6,00,000 — Rs. 1,00,000 to each of their victims.

    According to Ravi Adsure, standing counsel for Maharashtra in the Supreme Court, the State filed a special leave petition against this order, which was heard on April 5, 2004.

    Plenty of evidence

    The apex court asked the Martis to surrender their passports and not to leave the country. However, the court allowed the couple to be released on interim bail on a personal bond each of Rs. 20,000. They later filed an application requesting that they be allowed to leave the country and agreeing to abide by the Supreme Court’s final decision. The court dismissed the application on November 4, 2004 and the matter has been posted for final hearing in a few months. Now it is learnt that the Martis are out of the country.

    Activist Sangeeta Punekar, formerly with FACSE, said that the High Court order allowing the Martis to pay money instead of serving their sentence had set a bad precedent. “That means if you have a bank balance, you can get away,” she said. In the other case, despite clear links between Anchorage and paedophiles all the way to Goa, the police did not pursue this connection, she said.

    There is plenty of evidence to suggest that Anchorage Shelter was more than just a shelter for boys. The testimonies of the young boys are quite eloquent of the systematic abuse spread over several years. In a case some years earlier, a 14-year-old Sunil (name changed), from Nagpur, told the court of assistant sessions judge at Panaji on December 16, 1998, that while he was working in Mumbai as a shoeshine boy he met some boys who asked him if he was “willing to do unnatural sexual activities.” A boy called Johnny took him to meet Duncan Grant (whom he refers to as Dunkel in his statement) at a place in Colaba. This man from London, according to Sunil’s testimony, allowed him to stay and gave him food. There were about 50 to 60 other boys staying with Duncan.

    Another foreigner took him to a guesthouse and paid him Rs. 500 for his services. He was given Rs. 40,000 and a mobile telephone after spending more time with this man. Sunil later met another foreigner, Helmut Brinkmann, who took him to the guesthouse again and abused him. Brinkmann took the boy with him to Goa. The local police at Calangute raided the hotel and Brinkmann was found with the boy. After Sunil’s testimony, Brinkmann was arrested on August 27, 1998. The sessions court at Panaji sentenced him to six years rigorous imprisonment in February 1999. However, Brinkmann appealed and was acquitted in September 1999. Despite a look out notice, he managed to leave the country in October.

    Vulnerable

    Interestingly, the guesthouse was recently the scene of a similar offence, when officers of the Colaba police station raided a room on January 6, 2005 and found a British national, John Wheeldon, along with two boys. Inspector R.B. Gaikar of the Colaba police station said that Wheeldon asked the boys to give him a “massage,” at the guesthouse. Both worked as tourist guides around the Gateway of India. Wheeldon was arrested and is now in judicial custody and his passport has been impounded. There is no connection with Grant or Waters, Gaikar said, though they have alerted Interpol and the U.K. embassy. The lodge owners have been instructed to report such suspicious activity as the 25 to 30 cheap lodges that abound in the area are often used for such nefarious purposes.

    Nawal Bajaj, deputy commissioner of police, says, “There is no reason why a foreigner should spend two hours in a lodge with a shoeshine boy. We have sound evidence in this case.”

    Wheeldon had visited India in 1993 and 1994, when he had also gone to Goa. During this trip he was expected to go to Sri Lanka as well. The police are still waiting for medical reports of the boys before filing a charge sheet.

    The numerous children, who mill around popular tourist spots in Mumbai, are vulnerable to such abuse. Most are migrants and live on the road with their families. The money offered in exchange for such abuse is too tempting for many of them. For instance, Sunil spent the Rs. 40,000 he received for his sister’s wedding.

    Anchorage Shelter did not even have a licence to operate, and in the guise of charity, children were subject to exploitation. Denial of the problem by the authorities as in Goa has often been the bane of child rights activists but the problem cannot be wished away. There is no specific law to deal with this crime in India and the onus of proof often lies with the victim. Apart from the infamous Freddy Peats who was convicted in 1996, for running an organised racket in paedophilia, and is serving a life sentence now, paedophiles have more often than not got away scotfree or allowed to escape. The extradition of Waters is a welcome precedent but the question is, will it be the only one?

  4. எல்லா கிருத்துவர்களும், திமுகவிற்கு ஓட்டுப் போடவேண்டும் – கலைஞர் டிவியில் பிஷப்புகள் பிரச்ச Says:

    […] [1] https://christianityindia.wordpress.com/2011/03/21/christianity-pedophile-orphanages-pornography/ […]

  5. எல்லா கிருத்துவர்களும், திமுகவிற்கு ஓட்டுப் போடவேண்டும் – கலைஞர் டிவியில் பிஷப்புகள் பிரச்ச Says:

    […] [1] https://christianityindia.wordpress.com/2011/03/21/christianity-pedophile-orphanages-pornography/ […]

  6. சமூக விரோத செயல்களுக்காக குழந்தைகள் கடத்தல்: சொல்கிறார் காங். எம்.பி! « சமூகத் தீவிரவாதம் Says:

    […] [12] https://christianityindia.wordpress.com/2011/03/21/christianity-pedophile-orphanages-pornography/ […]

  7. ஹிந்து-என்–டி-டிவி, டான் பாஸ்கோ, சிறுவர்-பாலியல், செக்ஸ் குற்றங்கள் தொடர்பு என்ன? « கிருத்துவம Says:

    […] [5] https://christianityindia.wordpress.com/2011/03/21/christianity-pedophile-orphanages-pornography/ […]

  8. ஹிந்து-என்–டி-டிவி, டான் பாஸ்கோ, சிறுவர்-பாலியல், செக்ஸ் குற்றங்கள் தொடர்பு என்ன? « இந்தியாவில Says:

    […] [12] https://christianityindia.wordpress.com/2011/03/21/christianity-pedophile-orphanages-pornography/ […]

  9. கஞ்சி குடித்த கருணாநிதியும், கேக் சாப்பிட்ட ஜெயலலிதாவும்: கிறிஸ்தவர்கள் ஜெருசலேம் செல்ல அரசு Says:

    […] [13] https://christianityindia.wordpress.com/2011/03/21/christianity-pedophile-orphanages-pornography/ […]

  10. 14 / 16 வயது கன்னியை கற்பழித்ததை, குழந்தையைக் கற்பழித்ததாக செய்திகளைப் போடுகிறார்கள், ஏன்? « இந்த Says:

    […] [18] https://christianityindia.wordpress.com/2011/03/21/christianity-pedophile-orphanages-pornography/ […]

  11. பாதிரிகளின் தொடர்ச்சியான செக்ஸ் தொல்லை: சிறுவர்-சிறுமியர்களை வன்புணர்தல், ஓரின புணர்ச்சி முத Says:

    […] [3] https://christianityindia.wordpress.com/2011/03/21/christianity-pedophile-orphanages-pornography/ […]

  12. பாதிரிகளின் தொடர்ச்சியான செக்ஸ் தொல்லை: சிறுவர்-சிறுமியர்களை வன்புணர்தல், ஓரின புணர்ச்சி முத Says:

    […] [3] https://christianityindia.wordpress.com/2011/03/21/christianity-pedophile-orphanages-pornography/ […]

  13. பாதிரிகளின் தொடர்ச்சியான செக்ஸ் தொல்லை: சிறுவர்-சிறுமியர்களை வன்புணர்தல், ஓரின புணர்ச்சி முத Says:

    […] [3] https://christianityindia.wordpress.com/2011/03/21/christianity-pedophile-orphanages-pornography/ […]

  14. கற்பழிப்பு எனும்போது, குழந்தைக் கற்பழிப்பாளிகளை ஏன் இந்தியர்கள் மற்றும் இத்தாலியர்கள் மறந்த Says:

    […] [16] https://christianityindia.wordpress.com/2011/03/21/christianity-pedophile-orphanages-pornography/ […]

  15. சிறுவர் செக்ஸ் / வன்புணர்ச்சி, சிறுவர் பாலியல், சிறுவர் ஆபாசப் படம்: உலகெங்கிலும் 348 பேர் கைது! | இ Says:

    […] [1] https://christianityindia.wordpress.com/2011/03/21/christianity-pedophile-orphanages-pornography/ […]

  16. சிறுவர் செக்ஸ் / வன்புணர்ச்சி, சிறுவர் பாலியல், சிறுவர் ஆபாசப் படம்: உலகெங்கிலும் 348 பேர் கைது! | இ Says:

    […] [1] https://christianityindia.wordpress.com/2011/03/21/christianity-pedophile-orphanages-pornography/ […]

  17. 2011 மற்றும் 2016 தேர்தல்கள் – கிறிஸ்தவ மத-அடிப்படைவாதம் மறைக்கும் கிறிஸ்தவர்களின் ஊழல்கள், கற்பழி Says:

    […] [6] https://christianityindia.wordpress.com/2011/03/21/christianity-pedophile-orphanages-pornography/ […]

  18. 2011 மற்றும் 2016 தேர்தல்கள் – கிறிஸ்தவ மத-அடிப்படைவாதம் மறைக்கும் கிறிஸ்தவர்களின் ஊழல்கள், கற்பழி Says:

    […] [6] https://christianityindia.wordpress.com/2011/03/21/christianity-pedophile-orphanages-pornography/ […]

மறுமொழியொன்றை இடுங்கள்

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / மாற்று )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / மாற்று )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / மாற்று )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / மாற்று )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: